Monday, January 27, 2014

Exploring Buddhist Anarchism, pt. 1

First of all, I would like to apologize for failing to update this blog in recent months. With the formation of the Anti-Oppression Forum, my attention has been focused on our new blog, Until Victory. However, It do want to make sure that I keep this space for more personal and philosophical writings. Along with radical politics, the philosophy and practice of Buddhism has been a cornerstone of my personal beliefs for a long time. Since the 1960's, the movement of engaged Buddhism has attempted to bring Buddhist lessons into the radical political sphere and radical political lessons into Buddhist practice. I believe that engaged Buddhism and Buddhist anarchism are schools of thought with tremendous power and possibility. Today, I'll feature the first in a series of posts exploring the subject, beginning with Gary Snyder's 1961 text entitled, "Buddhist Anarchism."


Buddhist Anarchism by Gary Snyder
First written in 1961, edited in 1967

Buddhism holds that the universe and all creatures in it are intrinsically in a state of complete wisdom, love and compassion; acting in natural response and mutual interdependence. The personal realization of this from-the-beginning state cannot be had for and by one-“self” — because it is not fully realized unless one has given the self up; and away.

In the Buddhist view, that which obstructs the effortless manifestation of this is Ignorance, which projects into fear and needless craving. Historically, Buddhist philosophers have failed to analyze out the degree to which ignorance and suffering are caused or encouraged by social factors, considering fear-and-desire to be given facts of the human condition. Consequently the major concern of Buddhist philosophy is epistemology and “psychology” with no attention paid to historical or sociological problems. Although Mahayana Buddhism has a grand vision of universal salvation, the actual achievement of Buddhism has been the development of practical systems of meditation toward the end of liberating a few dedicated individuals from psychological hangups and cultural conditionings. Institutional Buddhism has been conspicuously ready to accept or ignore the inequalities and tyrannies of whatever political system it found itself under. This can be death to Buddhism, because it is death to any meaningful function of compassion. Wisdom without compassion feels no pain.

No one today can afford to be innocent, or indulge himself in ignorance of the nature of contemporary governments, politics and social orders. The national polities of the modern world maintain their existence by deliberately fostered craving and fear: monstrous protection rackets. The “free world” has become economically dependent on a fantastic system of stimulation of greed which cannot be fulfilled, sexual desire which cannot be satiated and hatred which has no outlet except against oneself, the persons one is supposed to love, or the revolutionary aspirations of pitiful, poverty-stricken marginal societies like Cuba or Vietnam. The conditions of the Cold War have turned all modern societies — Communist included — into vicious distorters of man’s true potential. They create populations of “preta” — hungry ghosts, with giant appetites and throats no bigger than needles. The soil, the forests and all animal life are being consumed by these cancerous collectivities; the air and water of the planet is being fouled by them.

There is nothing in human nature or the requirements of human social organization which intrinsically requires that a culture be contradictory, repressive and productive of violent and frustrated personalities. Recent findings in anthropology and psychology make this more and more evident. One can prove it for himself by taking a good look at his own nature through meditation. Once a person has this much faith and insight, he must be led to a deep concern with the need for radical social change through a variety of hopefully non-violent means.

The joyous and voluntary poverty of Buddhism becomes a positive force. The traditional harmlessness and refusal to take life in any form has nation-shaking implications. The practice of meditation, for which one needs only “the ground beneath one’s feet,” wipes out mountains of junk being pumped into the mind by the mass media and supermarket universities. The belief in a serene and generous fulfillment of natural loving desires destroys ideologies which blind, maim and repress — and points the way to a kind of community which would amaze “moralists” and transform armies of men who are fighters because they cannot be lovers.

Avatamsaka (Kegon) Buddhist philosophy sees the world as a vast interrelated network in which all objects and creatures are necessary and illuminated. From one standpoint, governments, wars, or all that we consider “evil” are uncompromisingly contained in this totalistic realm. The hawk, the swoop and the hare are one. From the “human” standpoint we cannot live in those terms unless all beings see with the same enlightened eye. The Bodhisattva lives by the sufferer’s standard, and he must be effective in aiding those who suffer.

The mercy of the West has been social revolution; the mercy of the East has been individual insight into the basic self/void. We need both. They are both contained in the traditional three aspects of the Dharma path: wisdom (prajna), meditation (dhyana), and morality (sila). Wisdom is intuitive knowledge of the mind of love and clarity that lies beneath one’s ego-driven anxieties and aggressions. Meditation is going into the mind to see this for yourself — over and over again, until it becomes the mind you live in. Morality is bringing it back out in the way you live, through personal example and responsible action, ultimately toward the true community (sangha) of “all beings.”

This last aspect means, for me, supporting any cultural and economic revolution that moves clearly toward a free, international, classless world. It means using such means as civil disobedience, outspoken criticism, protest, pacifism, voluntary poverty and even gentle violence if it comes to a matter of restraining some impetuous redneck. It means affirming the widest possible spectrum of non-harmful individual behavior — defending the right of individuals to smoke hemp, eat peyote, be polygynous, polyandrous or homosexual. Worlds of behavior and custom long banned by the Judaeo-Capitalist-Christian-Marxist West. It means respecting intelligence and learning, but not as greed or means to personal power. Working on one’s own responsibility, but willing to work with a group. “Forming the new society within the shell of the old” — the IWW slogan of fifty years ago.


The traditional cultures are in any case doomed, and rather than cling to their good aspects hopelessly it should be remembered that whatever is or ever was in any other culture can be reconstructed from the unconscious, through meditation. In fact, it is my own view that the coming revolution will close the circle and link us in many ways with the most creative aspects of our archaic past. If we are lucky we may eventually arrive at a totally integrated world culture with matrilineal descent, free-form marriage, natural-credit communist economy, less industry, far less population and lots more national parks.

Monday, September 30, 2013

Hello, Anti-Oppression Forum!

For the year and a half, this blog has served as many different things. It started as a news site for the Unite Left organization, a group which never truly got off the ground. Then, I used it as tool for my local activism while I participated as a member of the Freedom Socialist Party. Finally, for the past several months after I stopped participating in the party, this blog and its corresponding Facebook page & e-mail list has acted as something like a micro-organization in and of itself. 

As you might imagine, an organization with a membership of two (me and Cameron, the co-editor) doesn’t work out so well. Not only has the requirements of updating this blog put a large amount of stress on me, it has also been ineffectual for building a radicalized group of people in the Hudson Valley.

That’s why I’m really happy to say that I’ve been working with several other activists in the area to form a leftist collective. We've been meeting Fridays @7:00 PM in the African Roots Library at the Family Partnership Center in Poughkeepsie. Our agreed statement of purpose says simply:

“We are a forum for activists to gather. We oppose hierarchy, social oppression, and capitalism.”

We’re only a month and a day old and still very small. A couple weeks ago, we organized a small protest against U.S. intervention in Syria by City Hall in Poughkeepsie. Last week, we passed out 30+ fliers around the same area with the dual intent of expressing our disapproval of jail expansion and getting the word out about our new organization. 

Last Friday, we decided on a name: Anti-Oppression Forum. We like it because it includes our goal of combating all forms of oppression—and because its initials (AOF) make us sound like some kind of badass Greek anarcho-syndicalists. Which might be true if you go back a few generations in family history...

Since the Occupy movement began to lose steam, there has been a vacuum in the Hudson Valley for anti-capitalists interested in non-hierarchical forms of organization. Our area lacked an anarchist collective, and that’s precisely what we’re trying to form.

If you think that "time's up!" for capitalism, social oppression, and environmental destruction, I think you should consider getting involved in this group.

Although a major part of the collective’s goal is to provide support for radicals marginalized by our system, we’ve already acted as much more than a social club. The AOF was formed to take action.

As I’ll be shifting the majority of my attention to the new group, the Hudson Valley Radical Facebook page and e-mail list will be put into the hands of the collective. Also, from now on this blog will stop functioning as a leftist news site. Instead, it'll simply be a place for my personal rants—and the writing of anyone who'd like to contribute!

Toward Collective Liberation,
Schuyler



The Anti-Oppression Forum meets Fridays @6:00 PM at the Sadie Peterson Delaney African Roots Library in the Family Partnership Center, 29 N. Hamilton Street, Poughkeepsie. All are welcome. You can visit our website here

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Why We Must Stop the U.S. Attack On Syria

Note (September 20, 2014): My thoughts on the issue of U.S. intervention in Syria has changed in the past year, largely because of what I've read by some Syrian activists on Twitter and other online platforms. While I am certainly opposed to U.S. imperialism, I think that the U.S. military actually has an obligation to support popular uprisings, including the Syrian Revolution, in defending themselves against dictators like Assad. The U.S. also has an obligation to ensure that it doesn't contribute to human rights abuses, and in preventing that the U.S. could work with Syrian revolutionary councils to monitor groups like the Free Syrian Army (an idea I took from this article about Syrian revolutionary Razan Zaitouneh). I think activists in the United States have to do more than reflexively oppose U.S. intervention when it might, if only accidentally, do something right. So while I say throughout this piece that the Syrian "revolution deserves better," it also deserved a better analysis than I gave it.
 

President Obama has declared that he will seek approval for a U.S. military strike on Syria when congress gets back in session on September 9th. This gives activists just under a week to organize against a further escalation of U.S. imperialism in the Middle East. Yet, it's not enough just to oppose the war—we have to be clear why.

Demonstration in Homs, before Assad turned violent and the Syrian protest movement became a civil war
As I have said in the past, I am strongly supportive of the Syrian Revolution. It is because, and not in spite of this, that I oppose U.S. military intervention. The United States has never entered a foreign country without attempting to open markets and broaden our sphere of power and influence.

The Syrian Revolution was begun by grassroots citizens councils calling for democracy and a more equitable economy. However, with U.S. military intervention, the possibility of Syria's future actually resting in the hands of the Syrian people would be obliterated. 

The Revolution deserves better.

Unfortunately, most the American left simply doesn't get it. Groups like the Workers World Party and the Party for Socialism and Liberation have been actively supporting the Assad dictatorship since Day 1 of the revolution. The basic reasoning is that because Assad has occasionally stood up to the United States, his bloody regime is worthy of their full support. Nevermind the fact that Syria has worked hand in glove with the Israeli government, supported the U.S. invasion of Kuwait in the early '90's, and brutally suppressed its own people for 43 years. If the Assad regime wins out, the possibility of Syria's future resting in the hands of the Syrian people would be non-existent.

The Revolution deserves better.

Other sections of the left are justifying their opposition to U.S. intervention by bashing the Syrian rebels and, like the U.S. government in its War Against Terror, by spreading fear about Islamist influence among anti-Assad fighters. It is true that fundamentalist Islamists have jumped on the bandwagon of the Syrian Revolution, but they did not start it and there's no reason to believe that they'll finish it. Just because President Assad characterizes the revolution as an Islamist power grab doesn't mean that progressives should believe him!

Another common refrain is support of a "peace conference" to be held between both sides of the conflict, including the imperial powers using Syria as their proxy. To hope for ceasefire and a brokered peace is to reject the demands of the Syrian revolution. It is natural to wish for an end to the bloodshed, but if none of the Syrian people's demands are met, a new rebellion is sure to begin anew sometime not far down the road. If the fate of Syria is carved out by imperial powers, the possibility of Syria's future actually resting in the hands of the Syria people would still be crushed.

The Revolution deserves better.

I believe that those striving for freedom and liberty around the world should stand firmly in solidarity with the Syrian revolution. Practically, that means that we should consider the self-determination of the Syrian people to be our core demand for our activism throughout the week to come. Unlike the Assad, Obama, and Putin administrations, the anti-war movement should actually care what happens to the Syrian people.

-Schuyler Kempton